Is Our Planet Earth Alive ?
The Gaia Hypothesis is not really a hypothesis, but rather a point of view and approach from which to follow the science of life on a living planet. While the Gaia theory is named after the Greek goddess of the Earth, it is less about New Age mythology or mysticism than it is about biology, chemistry, and geology, and how biology interacts to make the Earth habitable.- Some scientists even agree that the living Earth is alive in a very significant sense. Of course, many indigenous peoples around the world have always believed (and acted upon) that our planet is alive.
- Those who are irritated by the idea of a living planet will argue that a living Earth cannot be alive because it does not feed, multiply, and develop.
- Prem Das, a skeptic says, “You cannot scientifically prove that our planet is alive because life is a property that goes beyond the very limited framework of modern science.
- In September 1965, chemist James Lovelock began envisioning a community-driven, self-regulating bio-Earth while researching ways to detect life on Mars at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California.
- In 1971, microbiologist Dr. Lynn Margulis, along with chemist James Lovelock, attempted to flesh out the Gaia hypothesis into a scientifically proven concept by sharing her knowledge of how microbes affect the atmosphere and layers of the Earth's surface.
- Chemist James Lovelock first called the Gaia hypothesis the Earth feedback hypothesis, a way of explaining the fact that combinations of chemicals, including oxygen and methane, persist in stable concentrations in Earth's atmosphere .
- Gaia Hypothesis (Lovelock is an extension of Darwin's grand vision, including Earth) (Lovelock, 1986, p. 25). The 1983 model of the daisy world (Lovelock, 1983; Watson and Lovelock, 1983) was designed to illustrate how the Greek Earth Goddess worked (Kump and Lovelock, 1995).
- The Gaia (Lovelock, Greek goddess of the earth) hypothesis has been criticized for not fully explaining evolution by natural selection, especially competition among organisms (eg, Dawkins, 1982). Gaia is also given a plethora of proxies, which fuels the misconception that Living Earth desires its best.
- The nature of his hypothesis — the idea that life changes and in many cases regulates the Earth — proved prescient, and quite right. Scientist James Lovelock came up with his idea in the 1960s, when NASA asked him to see if his invention of chemical analysis could detect life on other planets by looking at their atmospheres.
No comments:
Post a Comment